here is one, so you know what you are looking at:
Everyone agrees the trains are bad and nobody agrees about why.
Nationalised for forty years and they were not better. Ownership is not the variable.
Depends which line. Some of it is ownership, most of it is that track and trains are run by different people.
Every decision is made on a shorter timescale than the thing it affects. Defer the maintenance, leave before the bill lands.
no likes, no ranking, nothing to win.
create an account or sign in to crib.
Antibiotic resistance is the slowest emergency we have and being slow is the entire problem. Nothing that takes thirty years to arrive ever gets a budget.
The number of people I know who have quietly cut something out of their diet and never mentioned it to a doctor is, now I think about it, most of them.
Everyone I know who is good with money either earns a lot or was quietly given something early. The budgeting apps are for the rest of us to feel busy with.
The honest reason I have not switched energy supplier, bank or insurer is that it is dull, and the entire industry is built on exactly that.
Sequels have not got worse. We got older, and no film is ever going to land on you the way one did when you were fourteen.
Make voting compulsory. Australia manages it, turnout sits around ninety percent, and nobody there appears to be living under tyranny.
I have changed my mind about anonymity online, and I want to set out why, because I argued the other side for years. The case I used to make was straightforward. Anonymity protects the vulnerable — whistleblowers, people in hostile countries, anyone whose opinion could cost them a job. Real-name policies were introduced by companies with a commercial interest in identity, and they were sold with a safety argument that the evidence never really supported. All of that is still true and I have not stopped believing any of it. What changed is that I stopped treating anonymity as one thing. There is anonymity from the state, anonymity from your employer, anonymity from other users, and anonymity from the platform itself. These are four different properties. A system can give you the first three and none of the fourth, and for almost everyone that combination is what they actually want. The mistake I was making was arguing about a slider when the real question was who each end of it protects you from. Once I separated them, most of the disagreements I had been having turned out to be people defending different columns of the same table.
Buying a house is the only serious purchase where you bid against a number nobody will show you, and everyone has agreed to find this normal.
"Just be more confident" ignores that confidence is downstream of having been right in front of people a few times, and nobody can give you that. You can only be handed the room, and whoever is giving the advice is usually the one who decides who gets the room.
Tipping culture has completely lost the plot and I'm saying that as someone who used to wait tables.
Nobody finishes books and we have all quietly agreed to lie about it.
Ask a city what it wants and it says better public transport. Ask about the bus and the room goes quiet. The bus is the only bit that is affordable, deliverable this decade and actually useful to people without money — and it is the one thing no city gets excited about announcing.
Everything is a franchise now and the honest reason is that an unknown thing is a risk somebody has to personally sign off on.
We keep calling it a housing crisis like it's weather.
Every complaint about immigration in my town is actually a complaint about not being able to get a GP appointment, and both parties have found it easier to argue about the first one.
Half the arguments I have with my partner are about the same four things and we have never once finished one. I am not sure that is a problem, which is new.
Moving house is the only reliable way to find out what you actually own, and the answer is always "far less than this".
Most people who say they "believe in science" mean they trust institutions, which is a completely different thing and much easier to break.
Software has got worse. Everything is a web page in a costume now — slower to open, does less, and it wants an account before it will tell you the time.
Olympic sports get worse as they get more professional. What people actually miss is the amateurism, and it turns out that was most of the charm.
Walking is free, works for nearly everybody, and has no equipment attached, which is exactly why you never hear about it.
What I actually miss is software that was finished. You bought it, it did the thing, and nobody moved the buttons on a Thursday.
I have started saying "I don't know" out loud in meetings and conversations and it has been quietly transformative, which I did not expect.
Football fans do not want their club to be successful, they want it to be theirs. That is why every ownership row goes the way it does.
Group chats replaced forums and we lost the thing where a stranger's answer from four years ago was still there when you needed it.
something you reckon. a gripe, a hunch, a hill you will die on. serious or not.
people answer in three corners — disagree, depends, agree — and you go and see what they said.
anyone can join with an email address. it is used to send you a code and nothing else.
what all this does to your head, and what to do about it.