here is one, so you know what you are looking at:
Everyone agrees the trains are bad and nobody agrees about why.
Nationalised for forty years and they were not better. Ownership is not the variable.
Depends which line. Some of it is ownership, most of it is that track and trains are run by different people.
Every decision is made on a shorter timescale than the thing it affects. Defer the maintenance, leave before the bill lands.
no likes, no ranking, nothing to win.
create an account or sign in to crib.
Tipping has quietly become a thing you do for a screen rather than a person, and I notice I resent it far more.
Moving house is the only reliable way to find out what you actually own, and the answer is always "far less than this".
Nobody knows their neighbours and everybody says they would like to, which suggests the barrier is not that we do not want to.
Nobody plays anything until it goes dark any more and I cannot work out whether that is the traffic, the phones, or the parents.
Something I have thought about a lot since I started managing people, which nobody warned me about: you cannot tell someone they are underperforming in a way that does not change the relationship permanently. I do not mean they resent you, though sometimes they do. I mean that afterwards, every ordinary interaction has a second layer. You ask how the weekend was and they are checking whether you are asking because you are being normal, or because you are softening something. That layer does not go away when the performance improves. It just gets quieter. I still think you have to do it. Letting someone carry on failing is worse, and the version where you say nothing and then act surprised at review time is the genuinely unkind option. But I have stopped pretending it is a neutral conversation that a good manager can have without cost. It costs something every time, and the honest thing is to spend it deliberately rather than believe the technique makes it free.
Every handover document is written by somebody who has already mentally left, which is why none of them are any good.
Youth sport got professionalised and the result is ten year olds with strength programmes and nobody left to make up the numbers on a Sunday.
Statistics should be taught instead of trigonometry. I have needed one of them roughly weekly since school and the other precisely never.
I cannot do a phone call any more and I genuinely do not know when that happened.
The best decisions get made quickly. The ones that drag on for months usually dragged because nobody wanted to say the obvious thing out loud.
We should be spending vastly more on stopping the next pandemic, and we will not, because prevention has no photograph attached to it.
The state of the roads is the most politically radicalising thing in this country and nobody in national politics has noticed.
Telling people to "just move somewhere cheaper" ignores that cheap places are cheap because the work isn't there, which is the entire thing you needed the money for.
Genuine question: has anyone actually changed their mind because of something they read online? Not softened, not "considered" — changed.
A thing about friendship after about thirty that I do not think anybody warns you about. It stops happening by default. School, university and your first job all put you in a room with the same people repeatedly for years, and every friendship you have was quietly manufactured by that. Then it stops, and the machinery goes with it, and nobody tells you because the people it has already happened to have stopped noticing. What replaces it is admin. You have to want it enough to put a date in a calendar six weeks out, and then to still want it on the night, which after a full week is a genuinely different question. The friendships that survive are not the deepest ones. They are the ones where somebody was willing to do the admin. I find that slightly bleak and also I have made my peace with it. The alternative was assuming it was about me, and it took about four years to work out that it was structural. Everyone I have said this to since has said some version of yes, and then said they thought it was just them.
A pay rise disappears in about four months and nobody warns you. You adjust, the new number becomes normal, and you are back where you started with a bigger flat.
Most political arguments look like disagreements about facts and are really disagreements about what matters. The first kind can be settled. Nobody in history has settled the second by producing a better statistic.
"Just be more confident" ignores that confidence is downstream of having been right in front of people a few times, and nobody can give you that. You can only be handed the room, and whoever is giving the advice is usually the one who decides who gets the room.
unpopular opinion but most "food deserts" are actually time deserts. the shop is there, people are working two jobs.
Subtitles have quietly changed how everybody watches television and nobody has written the piece about what that does to acting.
Anyone else notice that every "wellness" thing at work is something that would be unnecessary if the job were slightly less bad?
A thing I have noticed after fifteen years of interviewing people: almost every interview process is measuring how comfortable someone is being evaluated, and then reporting that as a measure of how good they are at the job. The tell is that the same candidate performs completely differently depending on the room. Give someone a whiteboard and three strangers and you learn how they handle being watched. Give them a real problem and an afternoon and you learn something about how they think. These correlate weakly, and we have built an entire industry on assuming they correlate strongly. What makes it hard to fix is that the noisy signal is cheap and the good signal is expensive. An hour of whiteboarding costs an hour. A realistic work sample costs a day of the candidate's time and half a day of yours, and multiplied across a funnel that is a real budget line that somebody has to defend. So we keep the cheap test and then add stages to compensate for its noise, which is how a process ends up with six rounds that are each individually indefensible. I do not have a clean answer. I have stopped pretending the current thing measures what we say it measures.
Half the arguments I have with my partner are about the same four things and we have never once finished one. I am not sure that is a problem, which is new.
Home advantage is mostly the crowd, and the empty-stadium seasons proved it — it shrank, it did not vanish, and what was left was travel and the referee.
Nobody actually likes standing desks. We all just got told sitting was killing us and now we're too embarrassed to sit back down.
something you reckon. a gripe, a hunch, a hill you will die on. serious or not.
people answer in three corners — disagree, depends, agree — and you go and see what they said.
anyone can join with an email address. it is used to send you a code and nothing else.
what all this does to your head, and what to do about it.