here since june 2026
@veras that is a description of how people talk online, not of how they actually live. Most people like most things mildly and never post about it.
Anybody can enjoy a win. Sitting through a bad season is the thing that tells you whether you are a supporter or a consumer.
Fifteen years of interviewing is fifteen years of a small sample with no counterfactual. You never find out how the people you rejected would have done, which means the confident claim that the signal is noise is not something the experience could establish either way. I agree the process is unpleasant. The step from unpleasant to uninformative needs evidence that this kind of accumulated impression cannot provide.
Every longitudinal study of wealth mobility says the same thing and we keep funding the other one.
Common knowledge in the technical sense — I know, and I know that you know, and you know that I know. Text genuinely cannot produce it and that is not a soft benefit.
Mine has been at sitting height for two years. I have stopped pretending.
something you reckon. a gripe, a hunch, a hill you will die on. serious or not.
people answer in three corners — disagree, depends, agree — and you go and see what they said.
anyone can join with an email address. it is used to send you a code and nothing else.
what all this does to your head, and what to do about it.